Key Features of Situation Ethics free essay sample

What are the Key highlights of Situation Ethics? Circumstance morals is a Christian moral hypothesis that was basically evolved in the 1960’s by a cleric called Joseph Fletcher and extended by Bishop John Robinson. It is a teleological hypothesis, yet rather than utilitarianism; it depends on Christian standards, and essentially the advancement of agape. The ethical worth of any activity is decided on its outcomes, not on the activity itself. The judgment is made on how much love is delivered by the activity. In the 1960’s the customary Christian Church was experiencing enormous change. Society was managing from post WW2 women's liberation, Vietnam War, social equality, adolescent and hippy culture, sexual freedom and a dismissal of conventional wellsprings of power, e. g church lessons. Martin Luther King’s heritage in the 1960’s set everything up for a transformation in social liberties and sexual opportunity and along these lines testing the conventional legalist approach. We will compose a custom paper test on Key Features of Situation Ethics or on the other hand any comparative theme explicitly for you Don't WasteYour Time Recruit WRITER Just 13.90/page This extreme change in the public eye underlies Situation Ethics which was a piece of a general move for individuals to have more prominent self-sufficiency and opportunity. Fletcher set out his convictions in the book â€Å"Situation Ethics† distributed in 1966, he is against antinomian and legalism draws near. The Antinomian methodology is the place there are no set standards. The circumstance should mention to us what is the correct activity and in the event that we are required to make any sort of move. We ought to tune in for the inward voice which numerous individuals see just like our inner voice. Fletcher couldn't help contradicting this methodology since he said it would prompt good insurgency. It was too obscure and numerous individuals would differ on which internal voice is right. The legalistic way to deal with moral issues depends on a lot of outright laws that everybody needed to apply. It is said we should look to apply these ethical guidelines to our regular day to day existences and to do this there must be a huge arrangement of rules, sub rules and guidelines we as a whole should follow. e. g. Customary Jews. Fletcher additionally ignored this contention since he considered it to be unacceptable to apply general standards to current good issues. Nonetheless, similarly Fletchers was not recommending an antinomian culture with no fixed principles by any stretch of the imagination, rather he was proposing that there should have been a situational way to deal with morals, he recommended that there ought to be one single, basic â€Å"boss principal† on which all choices are based, and afterward proverbs or rules which supported the leader, however which were not fixed â€Å"laws†. As a Christian, Fletcher arrived at the resolution that the â€Å"boss principal† ought to be the Christian thought of affection, maybe better depicted as the Greek agape love, which we comprehend to mean a â€Å"giving†, non-equal love looking for the eventual benefits of all. He said this was the main law of Situation Ethics, and that inasmuch as the activity was the most cherishing activity, it was the best activity, or as William Temple said â€Å"There is just a single extreme and perpetual obligation, and its recipe is ‘Thou shalt love thy neighbor as thyself. ’ †¦ this is the entire of good obligation. † which Jesus Christ educated in the accounts of the New Testament of the Bible Fletcher and Robinson both dismissed the possibility of a legalist society who outright standards and laws were the standard. Circumstance morals expresses that occasionally other good standards can be thrown away in circumstances if love is best served; as Paul Tillich once put it: ‘ Love is a definitive Law. ’’ They both contended that no activity can be portrayed as right or wrong it is just the assurance to look for another man’s joy, regardless of what the man is to you, e. g. Mrs. Bergmeier. As opposed to utilitarianism Fletcher kept up that the rule which applied to individuals was â€Å" the best measure of affection for the best measure of people† the situationist accepts that lone the order to cherish is completely acceptable. For instance, taking from the rich for the ravenous this is tolerating agape love. Fletcher proposed four working standards of circumstance morals. Even minded as it tends to be utilized for all intents and purposes by anybody in all circumstances, relativistic as it rejects such absolutes as never or consistently, individual ism which request that individuals ought to be put first and positivism which proposes that adoration is the most significant standards in the lessons of the good book. Fletcher underlined that circumstance morals manages human relations and should along these lines put individuals at the middle. Fletcher likewise made The Six Fundamental standards which layout the key thoughts of the hypothesis. The main; just a single thing is inherently acceptable: love. The second; the decision standard of Christian choice is love. The third: love and equity are the equivalent. The fourth; love wills the neighbour’s great, regardless of whether we like him or not. The fifth; just the end legitimizes the methods, nothing else. The 6th; Love’s choices are made situationally, not prescriptively. Fletcher utilized a few guides to assist him with clarifying †you can utilize the names of these as opposed to really expounding